Downtown Los Angeles, circa 1983

Downtown Los Angeles, circa 1983
STMcC in downtown Los Angeles, circa 1983

Friday, November 10, 2017

OH MAN, YA GOTTA... Er-- I MEAN, OH *PERSON*, YA GOTTA READ THIS BOOK!

.
.
WOMEN WHO MAKE THE WORLD WORSE
by Kate O'Beirne
copyright: 2006
.
KATE O'BEIRNE's book, WOMEN WHO MAKE THE WORLD WORSE, is an excellent overview of the destructive and dishonest aims of the Feminist movement. It clearly illustrates the fallacies upon which that movement is based and the myriad ways that all of society is negatively impacted by its preposterously extremist and psychologically warped theology. (Yes, "theology", because Feminism is not unlike some fanatical religious cult.)
.
I fear that O'Beirne may have done her book a disservice by giving it a silly title and having the cover display caricatures of some prominent misandrists who do indeed make the world worse. The subject of this book is too important and the text too seriously researched and revealing to be wrapped in a goofy dust jacket that might cause it to be misinterpreted as nothing more than a fast-buck Republican screed. That's not what this is and I assure you that the old maxim "Don't judge a book by its cover" certainly applies here.
.
I strongly urge you to read WOMEN WHO MAKE THE WORLD WORSE even though I nearly gave it only 4 stars for the following reasons:
.
* While the book's 199 pages are nicely organized and densely packed with eye-opening meat 'n' potatoes information, I felt that the text could have been expanded and the subject explored even deeper. The book stands as a thorough overview of Feminism, but it is not a comprehensive treatise on the subject.
.
* Missing is any significant examination of Socialism's part in perverting the healthy gender roles in our society. In his COMMUNIST MANIFESTO, Karl Marx wrote "The Communists everywhere SUPPORT EVERY REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT AGAINST THE EXISTING SOCIAL and political ORDER OF THINGS... The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible OVERTHROW OF ALL EXISTING SOCIAL CONDITIONS." 

.
Overlooked by most researchers and commentators on Feminism is the fact that undergirding and promoting the whole movement is (and always has been) socialists in positions of power and influence. THE GREAT IRONY is that without the muscle of MALE socialists in Congress, journalism, television, film, education, publishing, and in the Judiciary, the Feminists could NEVER have made the advances that they have in the past 40 years. (And by "advances" I don't mean laudable progression; I'm talking more like territory taken in battle during an unjust and deceptive ground war!)
.
* Curiously absent is any mention of the inadvisability of having women employed as officers at the street (or "beat") level of law enforcement. Just as O'Beirne accurately decries the lowering of previously established physical standards for military combat and firefighting positions in order to accommodate women, the same has occurred within the law enforcement community. (Space does not permit me to give a detailed accounting of the many ways female police officers have inadvertently endangered fellow officers and the public at large, and whose presence can sometimes unnecessarily escalate volatile situations in the field. Male officers are constrained by department policy and a desire to be promoted through the ranks from speaking openly their thoughts on the subject of female cops, but get them to talk "off-the-record", as I have done, and you'll learn the various reasons why the vast majority of them oppose the idea.)
.
* And finally, O'Beirne is the Washington Editor of NATIONAL REVIEW magazine founded by her guru, the NeoCon William F. Buckley Jr., the Skull And Bones "adept", Bilderberger participant, and Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member. If that doesn't set any alarm bells ringing in your mind then "You've got a long way to go, baby!" (Be sure to read my Amazon guide, 'SO YOU'D LIKE TO... SEE THE NEW WORLD ORDER IN BLACK & WHITE' when you're done here.)
.
Nevertheless, I gave this publication 5 stars because of O'Beirne's sense o'humor, and because she has written a fine and valuable book on a dire issue. Also because I knew 5 stars would anger the Feminists (and the males whom they rule) a full one-fifth more than 4 stars would!
.
Here are some excerpts from WOMEN WHO MAKE THE WORLD WORSE:
.
[Page XIV] (A law firm) recruiter asked me, "What do you expect to be in ten years?" I was expected to say something about being a hardworking partner or about specializing in some esoteric area of the law or something equally dry. I said that I expected to be about five years older."
.
[Page XV] Most radical feminists are qualified for only one job: professional Feminist.
.
[Page 14] In 1960, only 9 percent of all children lived in single-parent households. Presently in the United States, almost one third of children are born to single mothers.
.
[Page 36] Dr. Benjamin Spock, who, after frankly informing 1950s mothers that day nurseries are "no good for infants", deleted this advice from 1990s editions of his manual 'BABY AND CHILD CARE', which has sold millions. He explained that such advice would make working mothers feel guilty, and he recognized they were heading to work regardless. Spock admitted: "It's a cowardly thing that I did; I just tossed it in subsequent editions." Feminist intimidation has created plenty of cowards.
.
[Page 98] Title IX has been four times more effective in eliminating male athletes than in developing female athletes.
.
[Page 119] Feminists recognize the vulnerability of women when they are concerned with the plight of women who are victims of domestic abuse... Their position on integrating combat ranks puts them in the position of saying that violence against women is a terrible thing unless it is at the hands of the enemy, in which case it's a welcome tribute to women's equality... Minimizing the feats of men and exaggerating those of women is a familiar feminist tactic to promote their woman-as-warrior myth.
.
Personally, my greatest concern is that unless these extremist Wacky Women are stopped, they will eventually transform men (myself included) into the very mangy misogynist dogs they've always accused us of being. Nah, who am I kidding? My biggest fear is that so many Feminists (and the males they rule) will attack this review with so many negative votes that I'll suffer a nervous breakdown and cry like a little girl.
.
Read O'Beirne's book because, as the Brut Cologne TV commercial says: "MEN ARE BACK."* (*Pending permission from women to remain.)
.
~ Stephen T. McCarthy
.

2 comments:

  1. Kind of hilarious how Hillary Clinton is smack in the middle of that cover. People have been sick and tired of her for well over a decade and Dems are STILL not seeming to get it.

    Most radical feminists are qualified for only one job: professional Feminist.

    I love that. Kind of reminds me how these modern feminists go to college and spend 4 years getting a degree in something like LGBT Gender Studies, and then wonder why they can't get a high paying job. Or a job, period. Does that degree even do anything, other than help to spread/keep that degree going?

    Title IX has been four times more effective in eliminating male athletes than in developing female athletes.

    Have you seen this story out of Norway?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2017/10/08/norway-to-pay-mens-and-womens-soccer-teams-equally-after-men-agree-to-slight-pay-cut/?utm_term=.a1dabf49c045

    So... The men's team is literally paying the women's team just to exist, using money that the women can't earn themselves.

    EQUALITY!*

    ~J S-A

    *socialism

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Putting aside the fact that soccer is the most boring sport I've ever watched... or "attempted" to watch...

      Just now read the article you linked me to, J S-A. And, yep, "*Socialism" it is.

      In a Free Enterprise system, the most skilled athletes -- whom the greater number of viewers would be interested in watching and the greater number of companies would be interested in hiring as corporate spokesmen -- would make the most money. You know, meeting the natural demand.

      The whole anti-Free Enterprise / anti-Market Forces mindset disturbs me.

      As is nearly always the case, [Link> HERE, Selwyn Duke nails it with the clarity of a rational, High-I.Q. thinker.

      What this world needs is more Selwyn Dukes and less soccer players.

      ~ D-FensDogG
      Ferret-Faced Fascist Friends

      Delete

---> NOTE: COMMENT MODERATION IS ACTIVATED. <---
All submitted comments that do not transgress "Ye Olde Comment Policy" will be posted and responded to as soon as possible. Thanks for taking the time to comment.